Comparison of comparative method.
This is a comparative method comparison chart. These techniques are based on hazard identification by comparing with standards. The various methods are checklist, safety audit, hazard indices and preliminary hazard analysis.
| ||||
Purpose | For quick identification of hazards | For ensuring that procedures match design intent. | For identifying relative hazards | For early identification of hazards. |
Applicability | In all phases — design construction, commissioning, operation and shutdown. | In all phases of the plant and periodicity .of review depending on the level of hazard. | In design and operation phase used as an early screening technique for fire/ explosion potential. | In preliminary design phase to provide guidance for final design. |
Data required | Checklist is prepared from prior experience/ standard procedure manual/ knowledge of system or plant. | Applicable codes and guides, plant flow sheet, P & I diagrams, start-up/ shutdown procedure, emergency control, injury report, testing and inspection report, material properties. | Plot plan of a plant, process flow condition, Fire and Explosion Index Form, Risk Analysis Form, Worksheets. | Plant design criteria, hazardous materials involved and major plant equipment. |
Results | Essentially qualitative in nature and leads to “yes-or-no” decision with respect to compliance with the standard procedure set forth. | Qualitative in nature — the inspection teams report deviation from design and planned procedures and recommends additional safety features. | Relative quantitative ranking of plant process units based on degree of risk. | List of hazards (related to available design details) with recommendation to designers to aid hazard reduction |
0 Comments
Comment your doubt or opportunity to improve